现在就联系我们进行演示: [email protected]
Sustainability Business Intelligence for Corporates and Financial Institutions
  • 首页
  • 解决方案
    • 碳核算与碳中和战略
    • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
    • 可持续发展战略
    • 遵守 ESG 法规
    • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 产品
    • AERA 温室气体管理人
    • 企业 EPIC
    • 金融机构 ZENO
  • 洞察力
    • ESG 新闻
    • 环境、社会和治理趋势
    • ESG 学院
      • 温室气体核算
      • 遵守 ESG 法规
      • 可持续发展报告
      • 环境、社会和治理投资与报告
      • 可持续发展战略
  • 关于我们
  • 联系我们
zh_HK 香港中文
zh_HK 香港中文 en_US English zh_CN 简体中文 ja 日本語 fr_FR Français es_ES Español id_ID Bahasa Indonesia ko_KR 한국어
申请演示
Seneca ESG
  • 首页
  • 解决方案
    • 碳核算与碳中和战略
    • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
    • 可持续发展战略
    • 遵守 ESG 法规
    • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 产品
    • AERA 温室气体管理人
    • 企业 EPIC
    • 金融机构 ZENO
  • 洞察力
    • ESG 新闻
    • 环境、社会和治理趋势
    • ESG 学院
      • 温室气体核算
      • 遵守 ESG 法规
      • 可持续发展报告
      • 环境、社会和治理投资与报告
      • 可持续发展战略
  • 关于我们
  • 联系我们
申请演示
Seneca ESG
SBTi's FLAG

SBTi 的森林、土地和農業 (FLAG) 目標解釋

由 AnhNguyen
2025-02-04

目录

  1. What is SBTi’s FLAG?
  2. Why is the FLAG Needed?
  3. FLAG’s Key Requirements
    1. 2 Pathways for FLAG Target Setting
      1. Whole-Sector Approach
      2. Commodity Approach
  4. How to Set a FLAG Target
  5. 结论

The pioneering FLAG Guidance from Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) offers the initial structure for businesses in land-heavy industries to establish scientific targets, encompassing land-related emission constraints and removals. This guidance offers the opportunity for these companies to take significant steps in reducing global 温室气体排放 stemming from agriculture, forestry, and other land use, which make up 22% of the earth’s total emissions [1].

What is SBTi’s FLAG?

The Science Based Target Setting Guide for Forest, Land, and Agriculture (FLAG) is the leading global standard designed to help companies in land-intensive sectors set science-based targets (SBTs) for reducing and removing land-based emissions. The SBTi FLAG Guidance offers a rigorous, science-backed framework to guide companies on the necessary scale and speed of emission reductions, aligning with the 巴黎协定‘s goal of limiting global warming to below 1.5°C.

Why is the FLAG Needed?

The impacts of climate change are becoming increasingly severe, with the forest, land, and agriculture (FLAG) sector being one of the hardest hit. This sector is not only vulnerable to climate change but is also a significant contributor to it, accounting for nearly 22% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, making it the second-largest emitter after the energy sector. Deforestation, unsustainable agricultural practices, and land degradation all contribute to the release of carbon into the atmosphere, further exacerbating the climate crisis.

Currently, more than 410 companies with land-intensive operations have committed to or set emissions reduction targets through the SBTi. Nearly half of these companies are publicly reporting their GHG emissions, demonstrating a growing commitment to transparency and action. However, despite these efforts, few companies include land-based emissions in their targets or disclosures. This is largely due to the previous lack of clear guidance and standardized methodologies for measuring and addressing these emissions—until now [2].

The introduction of FLAG marks a turning point for the industry. For the first time, companies have access to robust, science-based tools to account for and reduce land-related emissions. Addressing these emissions is crucial, not only to keep the 1.5°C global warming limit within reach but also to mitigate risks related to food security and support the global transition to a carbon neural or net-zero future. Cutting land-based emissions will play a key role in averting climate disasters, restoring ecosystems, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices that can feed the growing population while protecting the planet.

FLAG’s Key Requirements

The SBTi FLAG guidance sets out clear requirements for companies, especially in land and agriculture sectors, to align their climate actions with science-based targets that address both emissions and land use. The key requirements are:

  • Establish short-term FLAG science-based targets: Businesses must set emissions reduction targets for the next 5 to 10 years that align with the goal of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5°C. These targets ensure timely progress towards meeting global climate goals in sectors like agriculture and land use.
  • Incorporate carbon removals into near-term FLAG targets: Companies are required to account for natural methods of carbon sequestration. These include restoration of natural ecosystems, improved forest management, silvopasture (integrating trees with grazing), and increasing soil carbon storage in agricultural lands. This step emphasizes nature-based solutions to offset emissions alongside reductions.
  • Set long-term FLAG science-based targets: Organizations with significant land or agriculture-related activities must commit to reducing at least 72% of their emissions by 2050. These long-term goals are set in accordance with the SBTi Net-Zero Standard [3], providing a structured pathway for deeper decarbonization.
  • Commit to zero deforestation by 2025: Companies are mandated to eliminate deforestation from their supply chains no later than 2025. This aligns with the Accountability Framework initiative (AFi) [4], ensuring companies address the environmental impacts of land-use changes and halt further forest degradation.
  • Set targets for fossil fuel emissions: For companies with land-based emissions, it is also critical to set separate targets addressing fossil fuel emissions alongside their FLAG targets. This requirement ensures that companies address all sources of emissions, both those from land use and from industrial or energy sources, as many businesses contribute to fossil emissions as well.

2 Pathways for FLAG Target Setting

Whole-Sector Approach

"(《世界人权宣言》) whole-sector approach focuses on reducing emissions from all FLAG-related products and activities across entire sectors. This method emphasizes cutting emissions throughout the forestry, land use, and agriculture industries as a whole, rather than isolating specific commodities.

  • Near-term and long-term goals: As mentioned above, targets can be short-term (over the next 5-10 years) or long-term, aiming to achieve a reduction of at least 72% of FLAG emissions by 2050.
  • Emissions thresholds: For near-term targets, companies must reduce at least 95% of their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, while Scope 3 targets require a reduction of at least two-thirds of emissions.
  • Separate tools for setting targets: Near-term FLAG targets are established using a tool provided by SBTi, while long-term targets, particularly for agriculture, are managed using the “Net-zero tool.”
  • Deforestation commitment: Companies that commit to FLAG targets are also pledging to achieve zero deforestation by 2025 at the latest.

Commodity Approach

"(《世界人权宣言》) commodity approach focuses on addressing emissions from specific high-impact commodities, primarily those with a significant carbon footprint.

  • Targeted commodities: This approach focuses on 11 major commodities: beef, chicken, dairy, leather, maize, palm oil, pork, rice, soy, wheat, and timber & wood fiber.
  • Flexibility for diverse companies: Companies with a broad range of products, like grocery stores, are encouraged to use the whole-sector approach. However, those with more than 10% of their FLAG emissions in a single commodity, such as retailers or food and beverage producers, can use the commodity approach.
  • Types of targets: Commodity targets can either be absolute or intensity-based.

How to Set a FLAG Target

Setting a FLAG target involves a structured approach that aligns with the SBTi guidelines and focuses on both immediate and long-term actions. Here are the recommended steps:

  1. Conduct a Comprehensive Emissions Inventory: The first step is to evaluate and compile a detailed inventory of all emissions related to a company’s operations and supply chains, including Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. This baseline assessment is crucial for identifying major emission sources and understanding the full climate impact.
  2. Choose Between Whole-Sector or Commodity Approach: Depending on the company’s activities and the composition of its FLAG emissions, the organization should opt for either the whole-sector approach or the commodity approach. This decision should be driven by the product portfolio and the relative impact of specific commodities on the company’s overall emissions profile.
  3. Set Near-term and Long-term Targets: Establish both near-term (5 to 10 years) and long-term (up to 2050) science-based targets that comply with the SBTi FLAG requirements. This includes setting precise percentage reductions and formulating strategies for achieving zero deforestation.
  4. Incorporate Carbon Removals and Nature-Based Solutions: Integrate strategies for enhancing natural carbon sequestration through measures like reforestation, soil carbon enhancement, and sustainable land management. These nature-based solutions play a significant role in balancing out emissions that cannot be completely eliminated.
  5. Engage Stakeholders and Build Internal Capacity: Effective FLAG target setting and implementation require the engagement of stakeholders across the organization, including management, operational teams, and supply chain partners. Companies must also build internal capacity to support sustainable practices that align with their FLAG commitments.
  6. Monitor Progress and Report Transparently: Regularly monitor progress towards meeting FLAG targets and report on achievements with transparency. This not only demonstrates accountability but also builds trust with stakeholders and investors. Align reporting with recognized frameworks to ensure clarity and comparability.

By following these steps, companies can effectively set and achieve FLAG targets, contributing to global efforts to mitigate climate change and promote sustainable development within the land and agriculture sectors.

结论

In summary, setting and achieving FLAG targets is a pivotal step in the battle against climate change, particularly within sectors heavily reliant on forestry, land use, and agriculture. By embracing strategies that prioritize sustainable practices, businesses not only contribute to global environmental goals but also strengthen their resilience and competitiveness in a rapidly evolving market. Proactive engagement in this transition is key, ensuring that companies are not only compliant with emerging regulations but are also leading the charge in driving positive change for a sustainable future.

参考资料:

[1] https://sciencebasedtargets.org/sectors/forest-land-and-agriculture

[2] https://sciencebasedtargets.org/resources/files/SBTi-FLAG-2-pager.pdf

[3] https://sciencebasedtargets.org/net-zero

[4] https://accountability-framework.org/use-the-accountability-framework/core-principles/

请填写表格。

申请 ESG 软件演示
关注我们
推特
Linkedin
开始使用
塞内卡 ESG 工具包
今天

监控投资组合中的环境、社会和公司治理表现,创建自己的环境、社会和公司治理框架,做出更明智的商业决策。

感兴趣吗?
立即联系我们

如需联系我们,请填写右侧表格或直接发送电子邮件至以下地址

[email protected]

我们的办事处
新加坡办事处

新加坡 018936,濱海盛景東塔 7 號,#05-01
(+65) 6911 8888

阿姆斯特丹办事处

古斯塔夫-马勒广场 2 号
荷兰阿姆斯特丹 1082 MA
(+31) 6 4817 3634

上海办事处

上海市静安区铜仁路 299 号 #2604B 上海市静安区同仁路 299 号 #2604B
中国 200040
(+86) 021 6229 8732

台北办事处

敦化南路 77 号 7 楼
第 2 节,达安区
台湾台北市 106414
(+886) 02 2706 2108

河内办事处

越南大厦 1 号,东大泰下
越南河内 100000
(+84) 936 075 490

利马办事处

豪尔赫-巴萨德雷-格罗曼大路 607 号
秘鲁利马圣伊西德罗 15073
(+51) 951 722 377

订阅我们的每周通讯
了解最新的全球环境、社会和治理政策、市场发展和使用案例。

© 2026 • Seneca Technologies Pte Ltd • 保留所有權利

  • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
  • ESG 数据收集与管理
  • ESG 评分和目标设定
  • ESG 报告撰写(ISSB、GRI、SASB、TCFD、CSRD)
  • 可持续发展战略
  • 重要性评估
  • ESG 评级分析与改进
  • 环境、社会和公司治理绩效分析与基准设定
  • 遵守 ESG 法规
  • 证券交易所报告
  • 欧盟分类报告(CSRD、SFDR、PAI)
  • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 投资组合自定义评分和筛选
  • 投资组合分析和基准设定
  • 产品和企业级监管报告 (SFDR)
  • 碳核算与碳中和战略
  • 碳盘查(温室气体议定书)
  • 基于科学的目标设定(SBTi)
  • 碳中和战略
  • 关于我们
  • 隐私政策
  • 使用条款
  • 数据处理协议
Facebook-f Linkedin 微信
qrcode_wechat
DMCA.com Protection Status
免责声明:Seneca Technologies Pte.Ltd. 根据 GRI 的授权使用。GRI 作为 GRI 标准的版权许可方,对 Seneca EPIC 平台中 GRI 标准的真实性和准确性进行了核实和验证。该验证仅限于确保维护许可内容的完整性、真实性和准确性。因此,GRI对Seneca EPIC平台或由此产生的任何产品的正确性、合规性、可信性、用途适用性或质量,或对被许可方使用GRI版权内容,不作任何默示或实际的陈述或保证;并明确否认对被许可方制作的任何报告符合经批准的GRI标准报告的标准,作任何默示或明示的陈述。
有关全球报告倡议组织标准的最新版本,包括修订后的通用标准、调整后的主题标准、行业标准、建议和指导部分,以及全球报告倡议组织标准词汇表,请访问全球报告倡议组织资源中心:https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/resource-center/。
© 2023 - Seneca - 保留所有权利

© 2023 - Seneca - 保留所有权利

Facebook-f Linkedin 推特 微信 qr_code
  • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
  • ESG 数据收集与管理
  • ESG 评分和目标设定
  • ESG 报告撰写(ISSB、GRI、SASB、TCFD、CSRD)
  • 可持续发展战略
  • 重要性评估
  • ESG 评级分析与改进
  • 环境、社会和公司治理绩效分析与基准设定
  • 遵守 ESG 法规
  • 证券交易所报告
  • 欧盟分类报告(CSRD、SFDR、PAI)
  • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 投资组合自定义评分和筛选
  • 投资组合分析和基准设定
  • 产品和企业级监管报告 (SFDR)
  • 碳核算与碳中和战略
  • 碳盘查(温室气体议定书)
  • 基于目标的碳设定(SBTi)
  • 碳中和战略
  • 关于我们
DMCA.com Protection Status
Facebook-f Linkedin 推特 微信

© 2023 - Seneca - 保留所有权利

  • 首页
  • 解决方案
    • 碳核算与碳中和战略
    • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
    • 可持续发展战略
    • 遵守 ESG 法规
    • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 产品
    • AERA 温室气体管理人
    • 企业 EPIC
    • 金融机构 ZENO
  • 洞察力
    • ESG 新闻
    • 环境、社会和治理趋势
    • ESG 学院
      • 温室气体核算
      • 遵守 ESG 法规
      • 可持续发展报告
      • 环境、社会和治理投资与报告
      • 可持续发展战略
  • 关于我们
  • 联系我们
申请演示