现在就联系我们进行演示: [email protected]
Sustainability Business Intelligence for Corporates and Financial Institutions
  • 首页
  • 解决方案
    • 碳核算与碳中和战略
    • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
    • 可持续发展战略
    • 遵守 ESG 法规
    • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 产品
    • AERA 温室气体管理人
    • 企业 EPIC
    • 金融机构 ZENO
  • 洞察力
    • ESG 新闻
    • 环境、社会和治理趋势
    • ESG 学院
      • 温室气体核算
      • 遵守 ESG 法规
      • 可持续发展报告
      • 环境、社会和治理投资与报告
      • 可持续发展战略
  • 关于我们
  • 联系我们
zh_HK 香港中文
zh_HK 香港中文 en_US English zh_CN 简体中文 ja 日本語 fr_FR Français es_ES Español id_ID Bahasa Indonesia ko_KR 한국어
申请演示
Seneca ESG
  • 首页
  • 解决方案
    • 碳核算与碳中和战略
    • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
    • 可持续发展战略
    • 遵守 ESG 法规
    • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 产品
    • AERA 温室气体管理人
    • 企业 EPIC
    • 金融机构 ZENO
  • 洞察力
    • ESG 新闻
    • 环境、社会和治理趋势
    • ESG 学院
      • 温室气体核算
      • 遵守 ESG 法规
      • 可持续发展报告
      • 环境、社会和治理投资与报告
      • 可持续发展战略
  • 关于我们
  • 联系我们
申请演示
Seneca ESG
carbon zero vs carbon neutral

零碳與碳中和:2025年ESG策略主要差異

由 AnhNguyen
2025-07-02

In the evolving landscape of corporate sustainability, two terms frequently dominate boardroom discussions and ESG reports: carbon zero 和 碳中和. While often used interchangeably, they hold fundamentally different meanings with significant implications for business strategy, stakeholder communication, and regulatory compliance. 

Understanding the difference between carbon zero and carbon neutral is more than just semantics. As ESG disclosure expectations increase globally and stakeholders demand transparent climate action, businesses must accurately define and pursue the right carbon strategy. In this 2025 guide, we unpack these concepts, explore their business impacts, and help you determine the best path forward for your sustainability goals. 

Defining the Terms: Carbon Zero vs Carbon Neutral 

Understanding the fundamental difference between these two concepts is critical for organizations setting long-term climate goals. While 碳中和 allows companies to balance out their emissions through offsets, carbon zero demands a deeper transformation that targets direct emission elimination. The choice between the two reflects an organization’s level of climate ambition, strategic investment, and alignment with evolving ESG expectations. 

What Does “Carbon Neutral” Mean? 

碳中和 refers to achieving a balance between emitting carbon and offsetting it. A carbon-neutral company still emits greenhouse gases (GHGs) through its operations but invests in activities—such as reforestation or carbon credits—to offset the equivalent amount of emissions. 

This approach is widely adopted because it enables companies to continue operating while compensating for their climate impact. Popular carbon-neutral certifications, such as PAS 2060 and the Carbon Trust Standard, validate these efforts. 

Key characteristics: 

  • Emissions are measured. 
  • Carbon credits are purchased to offset emissions. 
  • Business-as-usual operations may continue with incremental efficiency improvements. 

What Does “Carbon Zero” Mean? 

Carbon zero—often called net zero carbon 或 true zero emissions—goes a step further. This term implies that a company or product emits no carbon emissions at all, or reduces them to a near-zero baseline without relying heavily on offsets. 

A carbon zero strategy involves deep decarbonization of value chains, replacing fossil fuels with renewables, redesigning products, and transforming supply chains. Offsets, if used at all, are minimal and typically reserved for residual emissions that are technologically or economically unfeasible to eliminate. 

Key characteristics: 

  • Focus on eliminating emissions at the source. 
  • Minimal reliance on carbon offsets. 
  • Requires significant investment in green infrastructure and innovation. 

Why the Distinction Matters for Business Strategy 

"(《世界人权宣言》) carbon zero vs carbon neutral debate is not academic—it carries strategic implications across ESG reporting, stakeholder engagement, and corporate risk management. 

Investor Perception 

In 2025, institutional investors and ESG funds differentiate between carbon-neutral and carbon-zero commitments. According to BloombergNEF, growing concerns over offset quality have led many asset managers to shift focus toward genuine emissions reduction rather than offset reliance—signaling a broader industry preference for true net‑zero strategies over heavy use of carbon credits. [1]  

监管合规 

Regulations are tightening. The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) 和 ISSB’s IFRS S2 now require granular disclosures about emissions reduction pathways and offset usage. Greenwashing allegations can arise if companies use “carbon neutral” claims without transparency. 

Brand Trust and Consumer Expectations 

"(《世界人权宣言》) 2024 Accenture Sustainable Consumer Survey found that 74% of Gen Z and millennial consumers trust brands more when they commit to eliminating emissions rather than offsetting them. In an era of purpose-driven buying, this can drive revenue and loyalty. [2]  

Case Studies: Carbon Zero and Carbon Neutral in Action 

Microsoft: A Carbon Negative Ambition

Microsoft has set one of the most ambitious climate targets in the corporate world—committing to become carbon negative by 2030. This goal means the company intends to remove more carbon from the atmosphere than it emits. Microsoft’s strategy includes deep investments in carbon capture and storage technologies, electrification of its vehicle fleet, transitioning to 100% renewable energy, and restoring ecosystems to offset historical emissions dating back to its founding in 1975. Its efforts embody a carbon zero mindset, emphasizing deep decarbonization before relying on removals. [3]  

Interface: From Neutrality to Zero

Interface, a global leader in sustainable flooring, offers a powerful example of evolution from carbon neutral to carbon zero. Initially, the company achieved carbon neutrality by offsetting emissions across its product life cycles. However, it has since taken a more transformative approach by redesigning its carpet tiles to be carbon negative—removing more carbon than they emit without heavy dependence on offsets. This shift required reengineering materials, altering supply chains, and adopting circular economy principles. Interface’s journey showcases how companies can progress from compensating for emissions to eliminating them entirely. [4]  

Latest Trends and Expectations in 2025 

These trends underscore a clear shift from superficial climate pledges to measurable, science-aligned action. As scrutiny intensifies in 2025, businesses are expected not only to set ambitious goals but also to demonstrate credible pathways to achieving carbon zero or carbon neutral outcomes. 

Science-Based Targets 

Businesses are increasingly adopting Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) Net-Zero Standard, which requires a minimum 90% emissions reduction by 2050 and limits offset use to no more than 10%. 

Transition Plans 

Governments now demand detailed climate transition plans. The UK and EU require listed companies to disclose credible roadmaps to carbon zero or neutral status, with clear capital allocation and progress metrics. 

Offset Market Scrutiny 

A 2024 report by Reuters highlighted that 41% of voluntary carbon credits failed to meet permanence or additionality standards. [5] The era of unverified offsets is ending. Companies are urged to disclose offset quality, vintage, and project types.  

Scope 3 Emissions Pressure 

Stakeholders are increasingly focused on 范畴 3 排放—those from supply chains and product use. Achieving carbon zero often necessitates upstream and downstream decarbonization, requiring partnerships and innovation across ecosystems. 

Practical Takeaways: How to Choose the Right Approach 

Recommendation  Details 
Align with Stakeholder Expectations  Carbon neutral may suit SMEs or early-stage efforts. Carbon zero, however, signals long-term climate leadership, especially in high-risk industries. 
Invest in Decarbonization, Not Just Offsets  Prioritize operational reductions—efficiency, electrification, renewables—before offsetting. Follow the “Reduce, Replace, Remove” hierarchy. 
Be Transparent  Clearly disclose goal definitions, emission scopes (1–3), and offset usage. Use ESG platforms like 塞内卡 ESG for traceability. 
Plan for Evolving Standards  Align with ISSB 和 CSRD guidance. Differentiate between carbon-neutral branding and strategic net-zero transition pathways. 

最终想法 

Understanding the difference between carbon zero vs carbon neutral is essential for companies aiming to lead a carbon-constrained economy. While both approaches signal climate responsibility, they differ in ambition, execution, and impact. In 2025, stakeholders reward companies that move beyond offsetting toward true decarbonization.

Whether you start with carbon neutrality or aim directly for carbon zero, the path forward must be credible, data-driven, and aligned with science-based targets. The race to zero is not just about emissions—it’s about leadership, resilience, and long-term value creation. 

 

参考资料 

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-11-27/banks-airlines-use-controversial-solar-wind-credits-to-back-green-claims  

[2] https://www.accenture.com/za-en/blogs/sustainability/reinventing-consumption  

[3] https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2020/01/16/microsoft-will-be-carbon-negative-by-2030/  

[4] https://www.interface.com/US/en-US/sustainability/carbon-negative.html  

[5] https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/around-third-carbon-credits-fail-new-benchmark-test-2024-08-06/  

请填写表格。

申请 ESG 软件演示
关注我们
推特
Linkedin
开始使用
塞内卡 ESG 工具包
今天

监控投资组合中的环境、社会和公司治理表现,创建自己的环境、社会和公司治理框架,做出更明智的商业决策。

感兴趣吗?
立即联系我们

如需联系我们,请填写右侧表格或直接发送电子邮件至以下地址

[email protected]

我们的办事处
新加坡办事处

新加坡 018936,濱海盛景東塔 7 號,#05-01
(+65) 6911 8888

阿姆斯特丹办事处

古斯塔夫-马勒广场 2 号
荷兰阿姆斯特丹 1082 MA
(+31) 6 4817 3634

上海办事处

上海市静安区铜仁路 299 号 #2604B 上海市静安区同仁路 299 号 #2604B
中国 200040
(+86) 021 6229 8732

台北办事处

敦化南路 77 号 7 楼
第 2 节,达安区
台湾台北市 106414
(+886) 02 2706 2108

河内办事处

越南大厦 1 号,东大泰下
越南河内 100000
(+84) 936 075 490

利马办事处

豪尔赫-巴萨德雷-格罗曼大路 607 号
秘鲁利马圣伊西德罗 15073
(+51) 951 722 377

订阅我们的每周通讯
了解最新的全球环境、社会和治理政策、市场发展和使用案例。

© 2026 • Seneca Technologies Pte Ltd • 保留所有權利

  • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
  • ESG 数据收集与管理
  • ESG 评分和目标设定
  • ESG 报告撰写(ISSB、GRI、SASB、TCFD、CSRD)
  • 可持续发展战略
  • 重要性评估
  • ESG 评级分析与改进
  • 环境、社会和公司治理绩效分析与基准设定
  • 遵守 ESG 法规
  • 证券交易所报告
  • 欧盟分类报告(CSRD、SFDR、PAI)
  • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 投资组合自定义评分和筛选
  • 投资组合分析和基准设定
  • 产品和企业级监管报告 (SFDR)
  • 碳核算与碳中和战略
  • 碳盘查(温室气体议定书)
  • 基于科学的目标设定(SBTi)
  • 碳中和战略
  • 关于我们
  • 隐私政策
  • 使用条款
  • 数据处理协议
Facebook-f Linkedin 微信
qrcode_wechat
DMCA.com Protection Status
免责声明:Seneca Technologies Pte.Ltd. 根据 GRI 的授权使用。GRI 作为 GRI 标准的版权许可方,对 Seneca EPIC 平台中 GRI 标准的真实性和准确性进行了核实和验证。该验证仅限于确保维护许可内容的完整性、真实性和准确性。因此,GRI对Seneca EPIC平台或由此产生的任何产品的正确性、合规性、可信性、用途适用性或质量,或对被许可方使用GRI版权内容,不作任何默示或实际的陈述或保证;并明确否认对被许可方制作的任何报告符合经批准的GRI标准报告的标准,作任何默示或明示的陈述。
有关全球报告倡议组织标准的最新版本,包括修订后的通用标准、调整后的主题标准、行业标准、建议和指导部分,以及全球报告倡议组织标准词汇表,请访问全球报告倡议组织资源中心:https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/resource-center/。
© 2023 - Seneca - 保留所有权利

© 2023 - Seneca - 保留所有权利

Facebook-f Linkedin 推特 微信 qr_code
  • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
  • ESG 数据收集与管理
  • ESG 评分和目标设定
  • ESG 报告撰写(ISSB、GRI、SASB、TCFD、CSRD)
  • 可持续发展战略
  • 重要性评估
  • ESG 评级分析与改进
  • 环境、社会和公司治理绩效分析与基准设定
  • 遵守 ESG 法规
  • 证券交易所报告
  • 欧盟分类报告(CSRD、SFDR、PAI)
  • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 投资组合自定义评分和筛选
  • 投资组合分析和基准设定
  • 产品和企业级监管报告 (SFDR)
  • 碳核算与碳中和战略
  • 碳盘查(温室气体议定书)
  • 基于目标的碳设定(SBTi)
  • 碳中和战略
  • 关于我们
DMCA.com Protection Status
Facebook-f Linkedin 推特 微信

© 2023 - Seneca - 保留所有权利

  • 首页
  • 解决方案
    • 碳核算与碳中和战略
    • ESG、企业社会责任和可持续发展报告
    • 可持续发展战略
    • 遵守 ESG 法规
    • 投资组合管理与报告
  • 产品
    • AERA 温室气体管理人
    • 企业 EPIC
    • 金融机构 ZENO
  • 洞察力
    • ESG 新闻
    • 环境、社会和治理趋势
    • ESG 学院
      • 温室气体核算
      • 遵守 ESG 法规
      • 可持续发展报告
      • 环境、社会和治理投资与报告
      • 可持续发展战略
  • 关于我们
  • 联系我们
申请演示